Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Lawyer & Attorney : Erich P. Rapp : Kean Miller Law Firm : Serving New Orleans, Baton Rouge, Shreveport, Louisiana

Mark Schleifstein of the New Orleans Times-Picayune writing on June 19, 2008 in an article entitled, Levee authority backs national '8/29 Commission' investigation reported that the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority had passed a resolution asking Congress to create a 8/29 Commission to investigate the government's handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The resolution was proposed by John Barry, the author of Rising Tide.

Barry stated,

"I'm really asking that they take a comprehensive look at the entire Mississippi River system, the entire Mississippi valley, from New York state to Idaho," Barry said. "They should look, for instance, at the dams on the upper Missouri River in detail, because they have a real impact on the amount of sediment that's carried in the river, which has a real impact on the erosion of wetlands in Louisiana."

"If the nation understood the reality of the negative impacts on us in the metropolitan area of economic decisions upstream that were made in the national interest," it might lead to better decisions in flood control involving both protection from hurricanes and high rivers."

John Barry has said it exactly right. I am not aware of anyone speaking more closely to my own thinking on the causes and solutions related to the loss of Louisiana's coastal wetlands than John Barry. The idea of a 8/29 Commission is an excellent one. The scope he suggests addresses exactly the issues that I have been raising in this blog. The loss of coastal wetlands in Louisiana is a national problem caused by the management of the Mississippi River drainage basin by the federal government. 

I am not suggesting the federal government should not manage the Mississippi River drainage basin. I am just urging the federal government to acknowledge and take responsibility for their predominant role in causing coastal land loss in Louisiana.

Erich P Rapp. 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The National Academies Press has published its First Report from the NRC Committee on the Review of the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Program. The NRC is the National Research Council which group acts as the official scientific adviser to the federal government. 

The report is available for free download as a .pdf file from the National Academies web site. This is an important report worth reading. This report is a response to the Corps' March 2008 report entitled, "Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Technical Report." In turn, the Corps' report was a response to a request from Congress for a category 5 hurricane protection plan for South Louisiana.

The Corps' report commendably speaks to the need to preserve and restore Louisiana's coastal wetlands in order to provide hurricane protection for the region. Nevertheless, one of the NRC committee's leading complaints about the Corps' plan is that it relies upon "sustaining the existing landscape" and yet the Corps has provided no evidence that it is possible to sustain the existing landscape. In this regard, the NRC committee complains that the Corps has not done the basic analysis of sediment available in the Mississippi River for a determination of what portion of the coastal wetlands in Louisiana can be sustained. If insufficient sediment exists in the Mississippi River water flow to sustain the existing coastal environment then the Corps' entire report is ill conceived.

If the sediment budget in the river is insufficient to sustain the existing coastal environment, the Corps and others will have to make some difficult decisions about what parts of the coastal landscape can be saved and what will not be saved. The Corps has not addressed this issue.

This missing analysis takes us to the core of the problem that I have written about in this blog since its outset. The most fundamental cause of coastal wetland loss in Louisiana, particularly south of New Orleans where below a certain point there are no levees, is lack of sediment in the Mississippi River water flow as the result of dams and reservoirs as well as locks and slack water pools in the northern parts of the Mississippi River drainage basin. These river structures reduce the sediment load in the river.

A reduced sediment load in the river is good for navigation and bad for coastal wetland building. The Corps must deal with a conflict between those competing interests. The Corps operating north of Louisiana wants a river with a reduced sediment load because that river condition makes it easier to maintain a navigation channel of a set depth. Less sediment in the river flow means less dredging of the navigation channel for the Corps.

The Corps in Louisiana has the same concern with navigation, but also has a need for sediment load for use in coastal wetland restoration and preservation. Those interests compete with one another to some extent. Unfortunately, coastal wetland protection and restoration in Louisiana does not get much, if any, consideration when the Corps makes a decision north of Louisiana adversely impacting on sediment load in the Mississippi River that will ultimately reach Louisiana. The interests of navigation prevail in such considerations north of Louisiana and most of those considerations within Louisiana.

The Corps needs to make a careful examination of the Mississippi River sediment load as it relates to proposed coastal wetland restoration and preservation projects. The Corps also needs to begin considering sediment load as it relates to Louisiana's coastal restoration and protection needs when it makes decisions along the entire course of the Mississippi River drainage system. Until this analysis is done and this consideration is given, no one will know what can really be done to preserve and restore Louisiana's coastal wetlands.

The current approach is to view coastal wetland preservation and restoration in Louisiana as a matter of regional decision making in relation to management of the Mississippi River in Louisiana. In reality, In reality, the preservation and restoration of Louisiana's coastal wetlands requires considered decision making across the entire Mississippi River drainage basin covering much of the continental United States.

Erich P Rapp.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

John Barry, the author of Rising Tide, has published an Op-Ed piece in the Los Angeles Times on Wednesday April 23, 2008 entitled: Who Should Pay to Protect New Orleans. I have never seen the cause of the coastal land loss problem described more succinctly or the solution described more accurately.

Barry points out what I have been saying less artfully for many years. The most fundamental reason that the coastal wetlands in Louisiana has been lost, particularly below New Orleans, is the reduction in the sediment load in the Mississippi River drainage system. This reduction has resulted from the construction of dams in the tributaries with particular emphasis on the dams built in the Missouri River in North and South Dakota. The lower portion of Louisiana's "bird's foot" did not erode to open water because of levees in Louisiana. Below a point, no levees separate the wetlands from the river and yet the land continues to dissolve into the Gulf. The problem is not the result of a local action.  

Louisiana derives no direct benefit from those Corps dams in the Dakota's and Montana. They were built to control flooding and improve navigation on the Missouri River. In fact, the Corps of Engineers claims that it has no authority to manage the Missouri River system and those dams for the benefit of the Mississippi River or its users in any way. The Mississippi River is treated as disconnected and unrelated to the Missouri River for all purposes that the Corps of Engineers considers.

John Barry is exactly right when he says the coastal land loss problem in Louisiana has been caused as the result of actions that benefited other parts of the nation far removed from Louisiana. The protection and restoration of coastal Louisiana is a national problem requiring federal action.

Erich P Rapp

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The National Academy of Sciences has appointed a committee of  the country's top scientists to peer review the coastal protection and restoration plans of the Army Corps of Engineers in Louisiana. The National Academy of Sciences is the scientific adviser to the federal government.

At a meeting on Thursday April 3, 2008, the National Academy peer review committee and the Corps held a public meeting concerning the peer review committee's work. The peer committee was critical of the Corps' plans in a number of respects.

The question being considered at the meeting was whether the Corps plans to protect and restore the Louisiana coast will work. The National Academy scientists began by questioning the Corps basic strategy which is to maintain the coast as it currently exists. The National Academy scientists questioned why the Corps was not considering other alternatives such as creating new land and allowing some areas to erode.

The National Academy scientists also questioned whether the Mississippi River carried enough sediment today to maintain the coast as the Corps suggests that its plan would do.The scientists seemed surprised and upset that the Corps' representatives did not have a basic knowledge of how much sediment the river carried and had not taken steps to determine if the available sediment was sufficient to achieve the Corps' objectives. 

One of the National Academy scientists questioning the Corps was Robert Meade. Meade is retired from the United States Geological Survey. Meade is well known in the scientific community for his knowledge of sediment transport in rivers and particularly in the Mississippi River. The representatives of the Corps might serve themselves well to read some of the scientific articles that Meade has previously published on sediment transport in rivers.  

The question of sediment supply in the Mississippi River is critical to the success of any coastal protection and restoration project in Louisiana. The sediment load in the Mississippi River has declined sharply since the 1930's as a result of the extensive construction of dams and locks in the Mississippi River drainage system. Dams trap sediment in the reservoir behind the dam and the locks trap sediment in the slack water pool behind the lock. The most significant sediment transportation reductions have occurred in the Missouri River and Arkansas River which are tributaries of the Mississippi River.

For navigation purposes, sediment in the Mississippi River is a nuisance that requires dredging. Much of the Corps operations in the Mississippi River drainage system are centered upon navigation. This means that for most purposes north of Louisiana on the Mississippi River and its tributaries, the Corps would like to see as little sediment transport in the river as possible. This desire, however, runs counter to the needs of coastal Louisiana. These navigational needs have in the past and continue today to trump the coastal restoration and protection needs of Louisiana. When the Corps considers how it will build and operate projects north of Louisiana in the Mississippi River drainage basin, the sediment transportation needs of Louisiana's coast are not typically considered.

Congress had asked the Corps to deliver the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Plan in December 2007. Now the plan will not be delivered until December 2008. Further, Congress had asked the Corps to identify a set of coastal protection and restoration projects that could be started quickly. Instead, the Corps has now stated that its December 2008 plan will not "include the specific identification of a detailed plan." Instead, the Corps' report will include aspects that require additional study before Congress can fund and the Corps can begin construction of the projects ultimately included in the plan.  

The National Academy scientists led by Robert Dalrymple, a civil engineering professor at John Hopkins University also questioned this "further study" approach.  Dalyrmple suggested that Congress might have been trying to create a sense of urgency after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita for more immediate action.   

The National Academy scientists also questioned why the Corps report did not include a major diversion of the Mississippi River south of New Orleans as many scientists and environmental groups have recommended. Instead the Corps report will suggest a number of smaller diversions. 

For a more detailed description of this meeting, see Mark Schleifstein's article in the New Orleans Times Picayune of Saturday April 5, 2008 entitled: Reviewers Grill Corps on Coast Plans. 

Erich P. Rapp.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The Bismarck Tribune published an editorial on March 7, 2008 entitled, Missouri River Study Could Be Spendy. The editorial concerns the current effort of certain interests along the Missouri River to have a new study done of the river and its tributaries.

The states along the Missouri River north of Sioux City, Iowa would like to see the Corps of Engineers conduct a new "Section 216 Study" of the Missouri River and its tributaries. In sum, these states would like to see the Corps rethink how it balances the navigational interests in the Missouri River which apply to those along the river south of Sioux City, Iowa against other interests in the river such as recreation, flood control, drinking water uses, irrigation, environmental protection, etc...

Most people in Louisiana probably do not think much about the Missouri River, but historically most of the sediment that built the coastal wetlands of Louisiana came down the Missouri River which enters the Mississippi River just north of St. Louis. After the Corps completed a series of dams in the upper Missouri River, very little sediment continued to flow down the Missouri into the Mississippi River. The old adage about the lower Mississippi River was that the water came from the Ohio River and the mud came from the Missouri River. Hence, the Missouri River's nicknames was the "Big Muddy" and "Dark River,"  and the residents along it used to say the water of the Missouri River was "too thick to drink, too thin to plow."

The people of the upper Missouri River recognize that the volume of barge traffic on the Missouri River has fallen to the point that it is not a significant economic issue any more. Thus, these people north of the navigable section of the Missouri River would like to remove or at least de-emphasize navigation as a factor in deciding how to manage the Missouri River.

This move should be of interest to Louisiana. If the river can be managed in a way that increases sediment load in the river, this could aid Louisiana's efforts to restore the coastal wetlands. The reservoirs behind the large dams on the Missouri River trap sediment, but management techniques and construction techniques exist for flushing sediment through such reservoirs.

The impact that the operation of the Missouri River has on Louisiana should be considered in any new study of the Missouri River. This impact has not been considered in the past and that needs to change.

Erich P Rapp.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

The situation in the Mississippi River where more sediment than ever is going into the river and less sediment than ever is reaching the coastal wetlands in Louisiana as described in the recent National Research Council report on the Mississippi River is not unique to the Mississippi River.

The problem is an international problem. On May 21, 2005, Science News Online published a report concerning river sediment entitled, Muddy Waters: More sediment is entering rivers, but less makes it to the sea. In turn, this Science news article was directly related to the publication of the scientific research paper entitled, Impact of Humans on the Flux of Terrestrial Sediment to the Global Coastal Ocean. This research article was published in the April 15, 2005 issue of Science Magazine in Volume 308 at page 376.

The conclusion of the Science news article and the research paper cited above are that humans have simultaneously increased the sediment transport by global rivers through soil erosion by approximately 2.3 billion metric tons per year, yet reduced the flux of sediment reaching the world's coasts by approximately 1.4 billion metric tons per year because of retention within reservoirs. Further over 100 billion metric tons of sediment and 1 to 3 billion metric tons of carbon are now sequestered in reservoirs constructed in the last 50 years.  Further still, coastal retreat is directly influenced by the reduction of river-supplied sediment.

The accumulation of sediment behind dams in accompanying reservoirs (particularly in the Missouri and Arkansas Rivers) as well as the accumulation of sediment behind locks in accompanying slack water navigation pools in other parts of the Mississippi River drainage system are contributing directly to the loss of coastal wetlands in Louisiana to the open sea.

Erich P Rapp.

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

I have repeatedly written about the role of dams, locks and reservoirs in the Mississippi River system and their role in the loss of coastal wetlands in Louisiana. Now, I will provide some research in support of this position.

Dr. Richard H. Kessel, a professor of Geography and Anthropology at Louisiana State University, is the person that has written the most extensively on the decline of the sediment load in the Mississippi River and its role in the loss of coastal wetlands in Louisiana. His papers have included:

1. An Approximation of the Sediment Budget of the Lower Mississippi River Prior to Major Human Modification which was published in volume 17, pages 711-722 (1992) of Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.

2. The Role of the Mississippi River in Wetland Loss in Southeastern Louisiana, U.S.A. which was published in Volume 13, Number 3, pages 183-193 of Environmental Geology and Water Science.

3. The Decline in the Suspended Load of the Lower Mississippi River and its Influence on Adjacent Wetlands which was published in Volume 11, Number 3, pages 271-281 of Environmental Geology and Water Science.

4. Chapter 12 Historical Sediment Discharge Trends for the Lower Mississippi River in Volume II: Technical Narrative of the Outer Continental Shelf Study by the Mineral Management Service, study number 87-0120 which larger document is entitled Causes of Wetland Loss in the Coastal Central Gulf of Mexico.  

The gist of Dr. Kessel's research shows that the suspended sediment load in the Mississippi River as it passes through Louisiana has declined by about 80% since the 1850's. He divides the history of this decline into three periods. These periods are 1) Prior to 1900, 2) a pre-dam period until extensive dam construction began between 1930 and 1952, and 3) the post dam period since 1952. The suspended load decreased 41% before dam construction began and another 51 percent after the dams in the Missouri and Arkansas Rivers were constructed. This change has altered the balance between sediment deposit in the wetlands adjacent to the Mississippi River and the ongoing process of subsidence and global sea level rise. In the most recent period, the rate of sea level rise and subsidence exceeds the rate of sediment deposit. Thus, the coastal wetlands are being lost to open water.

Erich P. Rapp 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks

On October 16, 2007, the National Research Council issued a press release concerning the publication of their upcoming report entitled, Mississippi River Water Quality and the Clean Water Act: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities. A pre-publication copy of the report is also available online as a .pdf file. 

Again, the National Research Council has emphasized an important theme related to coastal wetland loss in Louisiana. The report strongly suggests that the Mississippi River system including the major tributaries need to be analyzed and administered as a whole and not in parts. Decisions are often made in relation to segments of the system without regard to the impact of those decisions on other parts of the river. The report specifically mentions the lack of sufficient sediment in the Mississippi River reaching the wetlands along the river in Louisiana as an example of this management issue. Inevitably decisions made far to the north of Louisiana along the Mississippi River determine the sediment transport of the river as it reaches the wetlands in Louisiana.

The people in Louisiana and the rest of the Mississippi River basin need to remember this truth when they take action in relation to the Mississippi River.

Erich P. Rapp 

• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks