Although efforts to stem coastal wetland loss in Louisiana are already grossly underfunded, the Corps of Engineers is seeking reimbursement for a part of the cost of dredging the Mississippi River to maintain the navigation channel from the budget for coastal restoration projects authorized and funded pursuant to the Breaux Act. See the editorial in the New Orleans Time Picayune on Monday February 18, 2008 and the related article in the New Orleans Times Picayune on Thursday February 14, 2008.
The Mississippi River Commission, which is related to and controlled by the Corps of Engineers, is taking the position that the State of Louisiana and the Corps of Engineers must pay for any increase in dredging costs that result from any coastal restoration project in Louisiana that diverts water and sediment from the Mississippi River.
Officials for the State of Louisiana believe that the transfer of this cost to the Breaux Act coastal restoration projects will effectively shut down the restoration projects.
Interestingly, Garret Graves, the Chairman of the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority and member of the Breaux Act task force suggested that perhaps the Corps should be responsible for the damage to the Louisiana coastal wetlands that resulted from the Corps management of the Mississippi River.
Melanie Goodman, the Corps' Breaux Act program manager replied that actions related to navigation "a century ago" which are damaging the coastal wetlands in Louisiana are in the past and not subject to reimbursement.
Of course, this entire blog is dedicated to the idea that the Corps is making decisions and undertaking actions everyday that adversely impact the Louisiana coastal wetlands and that the continuing series of interconnected decisions dating back many years is, in fact the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers and the federal government.
The Corps' two part defense is that it did not know they were damaging the coastal wetlands of Louisiana many years ago when they built dams and levees on the Mississippi River and its tributaries. This is, of course, not true. The Corps has known since the 19th century that the coast of Louisiana was subsiding and that the sediment from the Mississippi River offset the subsidence.
The additional implication from the Corps' claim about the past is that the Corps is not taking new actions today that adversely impact on the coast of Louisiana. This is also not true. The Corps makes management decisions about the Mississippi River and its tributaries such as the Missouri River and the Ohio River, everyday that deny or reduce sediment transport to the coast of Louisiana. In many ways, an analytical disconnect exists between management of the more northern portions of the Mississippi River drainage basin and the coast of Louisiana. The analysis of Corps projects in the Missouri River or the upper Mississippi River or the Ohio River almost never consider the impact of these projects on sediment transport to the coast of Louisiana, and those decisions and actions continue day after day and year after year up to the present and likely far into the future. The Corps' suggestion that the damage they have caused to Louisiana's coast is the result of actions far in the past is simply not true. It is also the result of events planned and executed in the present.
Erich P. Rapp.
